Preparing to Go – Contraception

Not that I’m specifically planning to get up to much while I’m away, it’s always good to be prepared for any situation you might get into abroad.

As I have a particular fear of getting pregnant accidentally (I once genuinely took a pregnancy test as a virgin, don’t ask…), the thought of only relying on condoms doesn’t stick with me, although as they are the main protectors against STIs, it is obviously important that these are still used. I’ve heard the quality in other countries and particularly in Central and South America isn’t the same as in the UK, so I’ve been advised that taking a few with me is the best course of action.

Now, I also looked into several other contraception methods which I could use whilst travelling. I’ve listed them below with some pros and cons.

IUD or IUS (otherwise known as ‘The Coil’)

There are two different types of the coil available; one which releases hormones (IUS) and one which releases copper ions which stops the egg implanting (IUD). This can be inserted free at a clinic in the UK, although I have heard that the process of insertion isn’t a particularly comfortable one…


Pros for travelling: the coil is good in the fact that once it has been put in, it can essentially be left to do its job for 5-10 years. This beats having to remember to take a pill everyday, and another bonus is that the non-hormone releasing coil doesn’t screw with your hormones, something which I find very appealing as hormones affect my mood quite badly.

Cons for travelling: the main problem I had was the thought that if something went wrong whilst I was out there, I wouldn’t have easily accessible healthcare to be able to sort this out. This wouldn’t be a problem if I had had the coil put in a while before I travel – most of the pain, discomfort, falling out of coils and infections occur within the first month of it being put in. The problem is that the only available appointment was about 11 days before I set off, so I didn’t want to risk having the procedure done so close to my departure date. If it weren’t for that, I probably would have got this, even after reading all those online articles about how painful it is to have one inserted.

The pill


The combined pill is the most common (one which releases progesterone and oestrogen), though a doctor may prescribe progesterone if this is more suitable for you.

Pros for travelling: This is not an intravenous device, meaning if something wasn’t going right then I could simply stop taking the medication. It also gives me control of my menstruation which is invaluable when travelling.

Cons for travelling: The main thing I hate about the pill is that you have to take it every day at roughly the same time for it to be effective. Although I guess this isn’t really too much hassle, but it’s something else you have to remember. Furthermore, being on the pill in the past has really screwed with my moods. I get depressed often when my body is feeling hormonal and this is a feeling I would rather not have travelling.

The injection

My uni friend used to have an injection of hormones every three months from the doctors and recommended this as a form of contraception. Of course, because I’m planning on staying away for longer than three months this wouldn’t be suitable, but it is another option for shorter term trips. The usual con of having your hormones messed with is there.

The implant

This is having a small tube-like container inserted into your upper arm which releases hormones into your blood stream every month or so for a year.

For some reason, the thought of having this inserted scared me far more than the contemplation of having a T-shaped coil shoved into my nether-regions, but as I’ve previously mentioned, I’m not that great with needles.

Pros for travelling: this is once again something you can have put in a forget about. It also lasts about a year, which is a good duration.

Cons for travelling: what also put me off this one (apart from having a large needle shoved into your arm) is that it is once again an intravenous device, meaning that if there are any complications abroad then I would have difficulty sorting it out. This one also didn’t have the advantage of the IUD in that it still messes with your hormones, so I didn’t really like the thought of it. A few of my friends do rate this form of contraception though, so it is up to your personal preference.


Emergency contraception is apparently quite hard to get hold of in a lot of countries in Central and South America and Asia, so there’s no back-up plan, which is why I don’t really want to entirely rely on breakable condoms.

For me, I settled on the combined pill for the main reason that if I was experiencing complications with it, I had it in my power to stop taking it. Many sex clinics in the UK hand out this type of contraception free, and the lovely nurses there also offer free condoms if you visit! I’m always one for a freebie.

Advertisements

Published by

eqlever

E.Q. Lever is the pseudonym of a hopeful young writer living in London, England.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s